[Postfixbuch-users] LDAP Map Query Problem

Martin Ott martin.ott at itk-engineering.de
Sa Jun 26 11:28:21 CEST 2010


Hallo Alexander,

> # /etc/postfix/ldap-all_map.cf
> #
> # lookup for the dynamic all dispatcher alias
>
> server_host = zcp.example.com
> server_port = 389
> version = 3
> bind = no
> search_base = ou=Aliases,dc=example,dc=com
> scope = one
> query_filter = (mail=%s)
> special_result_attribute = memberURL
> result_attribute = mail
>
>    
...
> Wo kommt dieses Resultat her - feature by design? Und besser noch, wie
> verhindere ich dies?
>    
Dass bei der Abfrage mit key=all at example.com als value u.a. wieder 
all at example.com zurückkommt liegt an result_attribute = mail. Um das 
abzustellen kannst  du versuchen "result_attribute =" und 
"leaf_result_attribute = mail" zu setzen.

http://www.postfix.org/ldap_table.5.html

*leaf_result_attribute (default: empty)*
               When  one  or  more  special  result attributes are
               found in a non-terminal  (see  above)  LDAP  entry,
               leaf result attributes are excluded from the expan-
               sion of that entry. This is useful  when  expanding
               groups and the desired mail address attribute(s) of
               the member objects obtained via DN or URI recursion
               are  also  present  in  the  group  object. To only
               return the attribute values from the  leaf  objects
               and  not the containing group, add the attribute to
               the  leaf_result_attribute  list,   and   not   the
               result_attribute  list,  which  is always expanded.
               Note, the default value  of  "result_attribute"  is
               not  empty, you may want to set it explicitly empty
               when using "leaf_result_attribute"  to  expand  the
               group  to  a list of member DN addresses.


Gruß,
Martin



-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt...
URL: <https://listi.jpberlin.de/pipermail/postfixbuch-users/attachments/20100626/62b0d22e/attachment.html>


Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste Postfixbuch-users