[Postfixbuch-users] Probleme bei Kombination aus virtual domains und unix usern

Matthias Haegele mhaegele at linuxrocks.dyndns.org
Di Nov 11 16:48:22 CET 2008


Stefan Förster schrieb:
> * Uwe Driessen <driessen at fblan.de> wrote:
> [virtual alias maps]
>> First match wins
>> Kommt das Catchall vor den anderen einträgen wird der Rest nicht mehr abgefragt
> 
> Das ist nicht richtig. Die Suchreihenfolge in einer Tabelle, die in
> virtual_alias_maps referenziert wird, ist dokumentiert:
> 
> http://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html

TABLE SEARCH ORDER
       With lookups from indexed files such as DB or DBM, or from
       networked tables such as NIS, LDAP or  SQL,  patterns  are
       tried in the order as listed below:

       user at domain address, address, ...
              Redirect  mail  for  user at domain  to address.  This
              form has the highest precedence.

       user address, address, ...
              Redirect mail for user at site to address when site is
              equal  to $myorigin, when site is listed in $mydes-
              tination, or when it is listed in  $inet_interfaces
              or $proxy_interfaces.

              This  functionality  overlaps with functionality of
              the local aliases(5) database.  The  difference  is
              that virtual(5) mapping can be applied to non-local
              addresses.

       @domain address, address, ...
              Redirect mail for other users in domain to address.
              This form has the lowest precedence.

              Note:  @domain  is a wild-card. With this form, the
              Postfix SMTP server accepts mail for any  recipient
              in  domain,  regardless  of  whether that recipient
              exists.  This may turn  your  mail  system  into  a
              backscatter  source: Postfix first accepts mail for
              non-existent recipients and then  tries  to  return
              that  mail  as  "undeliverable" to the often forged
              sender address.

Würde bedeuten dass der Catchall "@domain" niedrigste Priorität hat,
egal wo er in der Reihenfolge steht
 oder irre ich schon wieder?


> Ciao
> Stefan


-- 
Gruesse/Greetings
MH


Dont send mail to: ubecatcher at linuxrocks.dyndns.org
--




Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste Postfixbuch-users