[Postfixbuch-users] Probleme bei Kombination aus virtual domains und unix usern
Matthias Haegele
mhaegele at linuxrocks.dyndns.org
Di Nov 11 16:48:22 CET 2008
Stefan Förster schrieb:
> * Uwe Driessen <driessen at fblan.de> wrote:
> [virtual alias maps]
>> First match wins
>> Kommt das Catchall vor den anderen einträgen wird der Rest nicht mehr abgefragt
>
> Das ist nicht richtig. Die Suchreihenfolge in einer Tabelle, die in
> virtual_alias_maps referenziert wird, ist dokumentiert:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html
TABLE SEARCH ORDER
With lookups from indexed files such as DB or DBM, or from
networked tables such as NIS, LDAP or SQL, patterns are
tried in the order as listed below:
user at domain address, address, ...
Redirect mail for user at domain to address. This
form has the highest precedence.
user address, address, ...
Redirect mail for user at site to address when site is
equal to $myorigin, when site is listed in $mydes-
tination, or when it is listed in $inet_interfaces
or $proxy_interfaces.
This functionality overlaps with functionality of
the local aliases(5) database. The difference is
that virtual(5) mapping can be applied to non-local
addresses.
@domain address, address, ...
Redirect mail for other users in domain to address.
This form has the lowest precedence.
Note: @domain is a wild-card. With this form, the
Postfix SMTP server accepts mail for any recipient
in domain, regardless of whether that recipient
exists. This may turn your mail system into a
backscatter source: Postfix first accepts mail for
non-existent recipients and then tries to return
that mail as "undeliverable" to the often forged
sender address.
Würde bedeuten dass der Catchall "@domain" niedrigste Priorität hat,
egal wo er in der Reihenfolge steht
oder irre ich schon wieder?
> Ciao
> Stefan
--
Gruesse/Greetings
MH
Dont send mail to: ubecatcher at linuxrocks.dyndns.org
--
Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste Postfixbuch-users